Movie Review – The Mummy (2017)

TL;DR – This is a good start for the Dark Universe and I really enjoyed it, but there were just a couple of things that needed to be worked on that held it back a bit

Score – 3.5 out of 5 stars

P.S. – There is NO end credit scene

The Mummy banner


Now from the start, I have to say I do have a lot of love for the 1999 Brendan Fraser Mummy film, I mean I even like its only follow up The Mummy Returns because they were wonderful camp fun with a horror veneer. Indeed I will always remember the first time I saw The Mummy as a kid, it was at a friend’s place and there was a whole lot of people crowded around the TV and VCR and someone was passing around cups of tea when the mummy awoke and it scared them so much tea went everywhere. So whether I like it or not, I’m going to bring those memories and that nostalgic feeling with me when I go see The Mummy because it has to hold up to the ones that came before and for the most part I think that it does. So today we will breaking down how well The Mummy does as a standalone film, how well it does as the starting point for the Dark Universe, and also look at some areas where the film needed improvement.

So let’s begin by setting the scene, well setting the scene twice actually. To begin it is the New Kingdom of Egypt, well they say it was, but then they also say the sarcophagus is 5000 years old which would put it more in the Old Kingdom but I digress. Princess Ahmanet (Sofia Boutella) was the only child of the King Menehptre (Selva Rasalingam), and all her life she knew she would be Queen and ruler over all the land. She trained every day and night to be a good ruler but then her father had another child, a boy, and in one moment everything she worked for was ripped out from underneath her. So what do you do when your world has fallen apart, well you form a secret deal with the god Set and go about killing your family as a sacrifice. But before Ahmanet could bring Set into the real world she was stopped, mummified alive, and buried in a tomb far, far away from Egypt, which of course is a plan that never goes wrong. Flash forward to today and two very important things have happened, first a crew digging a new railway tunnel find a hidden Knights Templar crypt, and in Iraq two US Army scouts Nick (Tom Cruise) and Chris (Jake Johnson) have stumbled across Haram where something once buried and forgotten now lays in wait and an archaeologist Jenny (Annabelle Wallis) might dig too far. Now, this set-up has a lot of working pieces that have to get into place, but when all three of these plot lines come crashing together it propels everything forward.

Sofia Boutella shows the power of acting with your eyes

Sofia Boutella shows the power of acting with your eyes

One area that I think they did very well was in casting because you have to build a franchise off this and you only have one chance to have your Robert Downey Jr. moment. Now I’m going to start with the big bad because if you have read my Kingman or Star Trek reviews you would know that I am a big fan of Sofia Boutella and her work. Her dancing experience gives her a remarkable physicality but more than that, she has one of the most expressive eyes in the business. Here even under the CGI and prosthetics, she had an amazing performance and honestly, I would have liked to see more of her in the film. As well as this, I did like Jake Johnson, he was perfectly cast as the witty sidekick to Tom Cruise’s Nick, and their banter together was one of the highlights of the film. This might be the perfect character for Russel Crowe because it lets him show his range, from that prim and proper gentleman we’ve seen in movies like Master and Commander, a side note, we need another Master and Commander film, and then also the brawler. Annabelle Wallis is an interesting addition and she holds her own in scenes with Tom which is not easy to do. One possible exception to this is Tom Cruise who it does fell at times that they had him playing a stock standard Tom Cruise action character, which does limit his character arc a bit. However, what you do get with Tom is an actor that throws himself into the action like very few people working in Hollywood do, and you see that here.

Now one of the highlights of the film has to be its action sequences that are peppered throughout. You have car chases, you have escaped from insurgents in the desert, you have monsters in the dark, and of course, you have one of the most spectacular sequences I have seen in quite a while. Now with this, I am talking about the sequence on the plane which I assume they filmed it on a reduced-gravity aircraft, I’m not sure you could film it on a rig but if they did wow that must have been some rig set-up. It is a great scene because first, it has a slow build as we see Chris get sicker and Nick starts to hallucinate, we know something bad is about to happen, but what. This is followed by something to distract you, then bang the first bird hits, and everything goes to hell. Now not every action sequence is as good as this, but it shows you how you can engage the audience and not resort to hundreds of cuts when trying to convey what is happening. Now I’m not generally a big fan of the horror genre because I tend not to find these movies scary, so this time I brought along my mother, and if her reactions were anything to go by there was some scary stuff. Ok even I jumped at that ambulance scene, are you happy, you wrought it out of me.

One of the highlights are the well constructed action sequences

One of the highlights are the well constructed action sequences

One area where The Mummy excelled is in the technical side of the film, the editing, music and effects. It might be a small thing but I am really fascinated in how you cut within a sequence and also how you transition between sequences, and so often no thought or more likely no money is put into making them visually interesting. However, here we have some really interesting transitions, especially between the hallucinations and the real world. I do want to give a special mention to Brian Tyler and his musical score, I’ve been enjoying his work ever since the score of the Dune miniseries and here he is so on point. The music is just as creepy as the movie, he uses discordant strings at infrequent intervals to really put you in the state of unease. Music is such a powerful medium to convey the story and it is really great to see when people use it creatively to effect the mood of the viewer. Of course, I have to mention the fascinating effects from Industrial Light and Magic. From sandstorms, to a murder of crows, to ghouls of all kinds, it is an impressive array of effects. I think the standout, which was a mix of practical and visual effects, was the first steps of the mummy which had almost stop-motion feel to it, a wonderful call back to the films of the past. But more than visual effects I have to give a shout out to the set designers, some of those sets felt expansive, and real and there is just something tangible about them that you don’t often see in this day and age. This was all helped by some great framing and good use of light and dark to create interest as well as contrast on the screen.

When it comes to the issues I had with the film they are not big but smaller little things which persist after you have left the film. The end of the second act and the start of the third did seem to drag a bit because it did kind of feel the movie was put on pause while they start introducing the universe. This meant that the slow build the movie was going for did not quite work as well as it could have. Also what was actually happening in that third act, a bit of explanation was needed. Finally, I just kind of feel that the last scene in the film was missing something, I can’t go into any more details or else I hit spoilers, but it felt like it could have ended on a stronger note.

It will be interesting to see where they go with this Dark Universe

It will be interesting to see where they go with this Dark Universe

So one thing we need to do is talk about how well The Mummy was as a launch platform for Universal’s Dark Universe. Now because this means we have to look at the story more in depth there will be [SPOILERS] in this paragraph. So this is a risky move for Universal, even though the Monsters might have been the first shared universe in cinema back in the day. This is because a lot of their classic monsters are actually in the public domain so there is a chance of them being undercut, also with the dominance of Marvel, and DC only just getting their act together with Wonder Woman, there is a possibility that we may be seeing a saturation in the market. Indeed with Wonder Woman outperforming expectations, there is a very real chance that The Mummy might get overshadowed, which is not where you want to be with your opening salvo. So with The Mummy they take less of an Iron Man ‘spoiler in an end credit scene’ approach to franchise building, and a bit more of a hands-on approach. Now as I said in the last paragraph this does lead to the movie taking a pause but it does give us an insight into the structures behind this universe. Monsters exist, and there have been people hunting them for a while to keep evil at bay, and at some point there is a distinction between monsters that are good and those who are bad, setting up the dichotomy for the future. I’m sure as they swept through Dr. Jekyll’s laboratory you would have picked up more than a few references to those classical monsters of cinema’s past, indeed it will be interesting to see just how many Easter eggs there are. I will say the one interesting thing I noticed is that one of the Books  in the library was the Book of the Dead from the 1999 Mummy film, which raises some interesting questions was this just a reference like the head appearing out of the sandstorm, or is it implying that they are part of these movies canonically. Look more so than in say Batman v Superman I am actually interested to see where they go in this universe from here. Though next time, don’t give away things like Russel Crow’s character before hand, if would have worked so much better if the Dr. Jekyll was a big reveal, instead you leaked it as part of a promotional trailer. [End of SPOILERS]

In the end, I have to say I did enjoy this first entry into the Dark Universe, sure my heart will always be with Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz gallivanting around 1920s Egypt. Well we can’t go back in the past, we can only look to the future and I’m interested to see where we go from here.


Trailer – Click Here to View (all trailers have heavy spoilers)
Directed by
– Alex Kurtzman
Screenplay by – David Koepp, Christopher McQuarrie & Dylan Kussman
Story By – Jon Spaihts, Alex Kurtzman & Jenny Lumet
Music by – Brian Tyler
Cinematography by – Ben Seresin
Edited by – Paul Hirsch, Gina Hirsch & Andrew Mondshein
– Tom Cruise, Sofia Boutella, Annabelle Wallis, Jake Johnson, Courtney B. Vance, Marwan Kenzari, Selva Rasalingam & Russell Crowe
Rating – Australia: M; Canada: PG; Germany: 12; New Zealand: M; United Kingdom: 12A; United States: PG-13


Movie Review – Jack Reacher: Never Go Back

TL;DR – The action is there, the characters are there, but something is just missing from this sequel that stops the film from excelling.

Score – 3 out of 5 stars


So full disclosure I didn’t watch the first Jack Reacher, nor have I read the books in the series by Lee Childs, and I was kind of tired of the film before I even went to see it because you could not open a Twitch stream, nor YouTube video without having to suffer through the trailer (yep that one right above you here). So I may not have come into the film with the best mindset but then honestly I don’t think you needed to see the last film or read the book to get the narrative because the writers use the opening sequence to pretty much set up the character of Jack Reacher (Tom Cruise) and his motivations, and thankfully it is that one scene in rural America with the sheriff and a phone call that you have probably already seen over and over again and they get it out of the way right at the start. So as far as American PG-13 action films go, Jack Reacher is not bad, however, it did feel like something was missing and because of that, it fell short of being a great film.

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back tells the story of, well you’ll never guess it Jack Reacher, since the last film he has apparently been hitchhiking across America and solving random military crimes along the way, because well you need to have your hobbies I guess. During his crime solving travels he starts contacting Major Susan Turner (Cobie Smulders) and after a while, they agree to meet up for some dinner, so Jack catches the first bus to Washington DC only to find out Maj. Turner has been arrested for espionage the day before and that Reacher has a surprise child who is now 15. From here a conspiracy will be uncovered, action will commence, and there will be a distinct lack of car chases.

It is one of Tom Cruise's stronger recent roles

It is one of Tom Cruise’s stronger recent roles

While it might feel like I am being a bit snarky at Jack Reacher, and well I am, but there were a lot of things that I really liked. Firstly Cobie Smulders is amazing in these roles and frankly Marvel we need to see some more Maria Hill in the future. She has the physicality needed to pull off a military character, and can clearly hold her own on screen with Tom Cruise one of the stars of film today. As well as this, the action is really good, with a lot of close hand-to-hand combat that has some great choreography, though if you don’t like the sound of broken bones, this might not be the film for you. Also, while I’ll talk about the mystery child sub-plot in a moment, I liked that the character (for the most part) acted sensibly, like hiding instead of the usual rubbish you see in these films.

Now while I did like the film, it was clear that something was missing that meant the film did not hold up as well as it could have. Firstly, it kept feeling like the film wanted to make a profound comment on something, from women in the military, or how we treat our veterans, or the role of military oversight, or the role of military contractors, or the corruption that comes from the last two. However, whenever the film gets to the threshold of committing, it backs off, like they wanted to make the comment but then they also didn’t want to ruffle any feathers and this is really disappointing because instead of something insightful we just get the usual platitudes. While I am sure it is in the books, one thing they could have done during the scripting process was ditching the possible daughter sub-plot. Danika Yarosh (Samantha) does an admirable job while the role they have given her, but it always felt superfluous to the plot and [Spoilers] it ends up going nowhere anyway so it all feels a bit meh, at least it needed to be integrated into the story better if you were going to keep it [End of Spoilers]. Also, Tom Cruise’s performance felt a bit flat, he is one of the most charismatic actors on screen at the moment, so it is a little weird to see him being outclassed during a lot of this film, though he still kicks ass in the action sequences. Finally, the story in general, look we know there are a lot of problems with the role of military contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan, hell we have already had a movie [Review of War Dogs] all about that this year. However, you would hope that the actually US Military would not fall for what is clearly a set-up job, and if they did, surely all the deaths that were happening around here would have sent up so many red flags, like so many red flags, like so many a Tibetan monastery would go, dude that’s too many flags … you would hope.

Jack Reacher Never Go Back 2

They do make a good team


Also, there were a couple of weird moments when it was clear that someone was being dubbed over as the lips did not match the words spoken. You might have been able to get away with that in Goldfinger but not in 2016.

In the end, there is much about Jack Reacher that I liked, but there are a number of issues that just hold it back from being a great film. If only there could be a good film on these really important issues, that I would really like to watch. (Also quick side note, if you are going to call your sequel ‘Never Go Back’ you really need it to hit a home run, or else you are begging people to title their reviews, ‘Never Go Back’ sums up the Jack Reacher sequel)

Directed by – Edward Zwick
Written by – Richard Wenk, Edward Zwick & Marshall Herskovitz
Based onNever Go Back by Lee Child
Music by – Henry Jackman
– Tom Cruise, Cobie Smulders, Danika Yarosh, Patrick Heusinger, Aldis Hodge, Holt McCallany & Robert Knepper
Rating – Australia: M; Canada: PG; NZ: M; UK: 12A; USA: PG13

Movie Review – Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation

TL;DR – A surprisingly good entry into a long running franchise, who knew Tom Cruse could still be this engaging

Score – 4 out of 5 stars


So here we are the fifth film in a franchise which is something quite rare, even rarer is that it is the best of the franchise so far.

So if you are unaware of what the Mission Impossible movies are all about let’s give you a quick rundown. The IMF is a secret intelligence organisation that takes on missions other spy agencies would find impossible, think of it like the American Bond (and the comparisons don’t stop there). This is the fifth instalment so there are a couple of things you take for granted when you go to see it, Tom Cruise is going to do some crazy stunt that even stuntmen would be like nope. A character is going to pull off their face to reveal that they are really someone else wearing a face mask, someone is going to get a message that will self-destruct in 10 seconds and Alec Baldwin is just going to be there to yell at things. All of these things happen and more, but the polish in which the actors, directors, effects people pull them off is remarkable.

This is a great film for a number of reasons, firstly the rapport between the cast is clear. Tom Cruise is in his element playing Ethan Hunt and even though Cruise is getting a bit old at this point he can really pull off the physicality needed for a role like this. Simon Pegg is delightful as Benji Dunn, the team’s tech support, he brings a manic yet endearing energy to the movie. Ving Rhames returns again (being the only other character to survive the all previous 4 films) as Luther Stickell and plays off really well against Jeremy Renner’s character William Brandt, all of the banter between these two characters is comedy gold. Newcomer Rebecca Ferguson is quite good in her role as Ilsa Faust and Alec Baldwin is always on point as Alan Hunley from the CIA. All of the cast work together really well and have that kind of chemistry that really helps make the film shine.


The chases are amazing

The stunts are amazing, in the first 5 minutes of the film you have Tom Cruise attached to a cargo plane as it takes off, and that is only the start. The locations are beautiful, Morocco and Vienna being standouts. The film is well paced and beautifully humorous in places and deadly serious in others without having a confused tone.

As I said this film in many ways feels like an American take on a Bond film, and if Skyfall has not just recently happened I would be calling M:I5 the best recent Bond film. In fact even with Skyfall M:I5 feels more like a Bond film than anything we have seen in a while. It has the gadgets, showing you can have the gadgets without being silly. It has the locations, in fact, there is a whole sequence set in an Austrian opera performance, just like Quantum of Solace and they do it much better in M:I5. As well as this it gets the tone of the old Bond films yet is able to modernise it for today’s audience.

Yes this scene is as awesome as it seems

Yes this scene is as awesome as it seems

Though not everything in the movie works as well as it could, the main antagonist of the film just doesn’t quite work. The filmmakers can’t seem to decide what sort of bad guy they want Sean Harris’ Solomon Lane to be, is he the creepy bad guy? is he the charismatic bad guy?, is he the calculated bad guy?, is he the crazy bad guy?. As well as this some of the set up at the start and the end of the film does not quite work or is a bit more transparent than I think they were planning it to be.

In the end, this is a great film, and if you go see it I am sure you’ll enjoy it.

Directed by – Christopher McQuarrie
Screenplay by – Christopher McQuarrie
Story by – Christopher McQuarrie & Drew Pearce
Based on – ‘Mission: Impossible’ by Bruce Geller
Starring – Tom Cruise, Jeremy Renner, Simon Pegg, Rebecca Furguson, Ving Rhames, Sean Harris, Jens Hultén & Alec Baldwin
Rating – Australia: M; Canada: PG; Ireland: 12A; NZ: M; UK: 12A; USA: PG-13